How Angelina Jolie will become a game changer in the battle of the breast implant companies

Call it collateral damage. She may not have been wearing a plunging neckline, but after her gorgeous debut on the World War Z London Premiere red carpet—like nothing happened!–the Google phrase “What kind of breast implants does Angelina Jolie have?” has got to be trending.

Screen Shot 2013-06-05 at 8.32.58 AM

And once the word is out, the demand across the world for whatever brand and style they are will probably put them on back order for a year. And the implant companies that weren’t used may even see their stock plummet. For a month or so, until the frenzy subsides.

I’m convinced that the “Angelina Effect” will change breast implant terminology forever. Which is great, because I think we were all getting bored with the same old-same old: the “round implant,” the “gummy bear implant” and the “teardrop-shaped implant.” Now there will be the “Angelina Jolie implant” (which, to clarify, must be one of the former three.)

Why is this so incredibly timely?

There has recently been an exceptionally intense knock-down drag-out war going on between the breast implant companies, as they are more aggressively than ever vying for plastic surgeons’ business.

Up until last year, for decades all we’ve had available in the U.S. were third-generation round silicone gel implants. Remember, these implants that we’ve been using are made of cohesive gel—the silicone is solid enough that it won’t leak out into the breast if the shell is ruptured, but it is still soft and moves (think “Jello®,” not “Gummy Bear”). And we’ve had two breast implant companies to choose from, Allergan and Mentor.

Meanwhile, Allergan has been tantalizing us over the past five years at our plastic surgery meetings with dinner presentations about their 410 implant, the miraculous shaped, form-stable anatomic cohesive-gel (translation: “Gummy Bear Teardrop-Shaped implants”) that was going to change breast augmentation forever. Apparently, it has already changed the rest of the world, but our FDA still wasn’t approving its use in the U.S.

Then last year, out of nowhere, Sientra–the little Brazilian “breast implant company that could”–got their Gummy Bear Teardrop-shaped implant through the FDA first.  (See last year’s post First New Brand of Breast Implants In Over Ten Years FDA-Approved and why this is such a big deal).

…and Allergan’s 410 just became available a few months ago…

And the war is on!

I have to say, the fallout has been tremendous for the plastic surgeons, especially for those of us who attended the annual week-long American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) meeting in NYC this past April, where the first round of competition took place.

We were wooed with extravagant Manhattan dinner events that could have been straight out of Gossip Girl. Allergan hosted an evening soiree at the glamorous midtown Cipriani’s:


Not to be outdone, Sientra took a few hundred of us out for a dinner cruise up the Hudson River on a luxurious private yacht from the  Chelsea Piers, complete with an open bar and our own personal après dinner fireworks show along the Manhattan skyline, timed perfectly to the music of Katy Perry onboard.

Screen Shot 2013-06-05 at 9.23.05 AM

The Statue of Liberty was a main focal point of the cruise—I’m pretty sure it was supposed to be a symbol of our liberty to use a new implant, and I’m not kidding.


To be fair, Allergan also had an open bar. 🙂 And they do have  their own fleet of especially attractive male reps and guys in corporate.

Okay, so now I’m going to get serious. This lengthy post is really meant for those of you who are actually thinking about getting breast implants, and are getting very confused by your research out in Cyberspace: “Allergan 410’s” “teardrop” “gummy bear” “Sientra.” Women are coming into my office asking for implants by names they don’t even understand the meaning of. And it’s going to get even more confusing when you see the new Allergan “Keep Them Guessing campaign popping up in your beauty magazines.

Yes, there’s suddenly so much new stuff out there that it’s even becoming hard for the plastic surgeons to keep track.

So which breast implant is the “best” implant?

Just because something is new and different doesn’t necessarily mean it’s better, or right for you.

I’m going to break down the whole new breast implant mystery as clearly as I can, with answers to the following questions:

1)   Are the new “Gummy Bear” implants less likely to leak than the ones we have been using?

NO. They are all cohesive gel. Again, think “Jello®”:

Screen Shot 2013-06-05 at 10.17.28 PM

Vs. “Gummy Bear”:

Screen Shot 2013-06-05 at 10.11.48 PM

2)  Why was a Gummy Bear  Teardrop-Shaped/anatomic implant invented?  I have friends who have round implants and their breasts look totally natural.

The third generation cohesive gel round implant will conform to and take the shape of your existing breast. The Teardrop-shaped (anatomical) implants were designed for breast reconstruction and breasts with deformities, and when they are used, the breast will take the shape of the implant.

Screen Shot 2013-06-05 at 10.07.34 PM 

Ironically, what I have found in my practice is that most of my breast cancer/ reconstruction patients don’t even want a “Teardrop-shaped” implant. Once they see that big round tissue expander blowing up, they get so excited about having Victoria’s Secret-looking breasts that they always pick the high profile implant.

Screen Shot 2013-06-05 at 10.02.05 PM

3) Why are the new teardrop shaped implants made of this new, stiffer “Gummy Bear” stuff?

Because if something is shaped, it has to stay stiff and keep the shape, otherwise it will turn into a weird shape when it moves. If a round implant changes shape, it just stays round. But if a “teardrop-shaped” breast changed shape, who knows what oblong-looking thing it could turn into.

This is also why all shaped implants need to be textured. Think of the textured shell as a sort of “Velcro®” that sticks to the surrounding tissues, keeping it from moving around.

4)   What is the difference between the Sientra teardrop-shaped implant and the Allergan 410?

Besides the fact that each company feels that their product comes in “more optimal” shapes and sizes and that their texturing is better than the other’s, the main difference is that the Allergan 410 is firmer. The advantage of this is that it probably is more effective in shaping a tuberous or tight breast. The disadvantage is that it definitely feels firmer. However, keep in mind that even the Sientra implant feels firmer than the regular round ones we’ve been using.

Screen Shot 2013-06-05 at 10.15.28 PM

Can you really tell that one is firmer than the other when they are inside, under the muscle?

I think it’s different in everyone.

5)   What is the softest implant available and why wouldn’t everyone just want that one?

In my opinion, the round Mentor cohesive gel implant is the softest third generation silicone gel implant out there right now. However, with softness comes increased chances of rippling on the sides, so if you have very little breast tissue or body fat to cover the implant, you may have to make a tradeoff between softness and rippling.

6)   Exactly how hard are these Gummy Bear implants, and how do they compare to the regular round silicone ones?

You should make a consultation with a plastic surgeon who has samples in their office so you can feel for yourself.

7)   My doctor doesn’t want to use the teardrop shaped implants because he said they can “turn.” How often does that happen?

I think that if the teardrop-shaped implants are used in the appropriate circumstance by a plastic surgeon who understands the principles of using them, the incidence of them “turning” is very low.

8)   Who is a good candidate for a teardrop shaped implant?

Someone who is an A or small B cup, with tight skin, who wants a breast augmentation and wants absolutely NO fullness of the upper pole (upper slope) of the breasts

9)   Who is not a good candidate for a teardrop shaped implant, and should stick with a round one?

If you have any sagging of your breasts to start with, or you are getting a redo like a removal and replacement, you are most likely better off with a round implant. To work well, the Gummy Bear Teardrop-Shaped implant has to be placed in a tight skin pocket.

If you don’t want the incision to be underneath at the breast crease (inframammary incision) The Allergan 410 implant is too stiff to place through a periareolar (around the nipple incision) and requires a little bit of a larger incision than the other implant options. Since the Sientra implant is a little less stiff, if you have a big areola, you can sometimes have it placed through a periareolar incision.

But what if I want them to look natural? 

Define natural. 🙂  True “natural” is flat and saggy. Usually when women say “natural” they mean “not big and fake.” If you have breast implants placed that are not too big for your chest wall, they will look natural. The “naturalness” of a breast augmentation has to do with the size of the implant used relative to the amount of space there is to place it. (see post from last year Can you always tell if someone’s breasts are fake?)

10)   Should I get textured or smooth implants?

One message I did get out of our big ASAPS meeting in NYC was that textured implants, once big in the eighties, are now becoming in Vogue again as the studies are showing that they have a decreased rate of capsular contracture (scar tissue around the implant). However, since the textured capsule sticks more to the surrounding tissue, they can have an increased rate of rippling, especially in a very thin woman. Again, another trade-off.

Remember, if you are getting teardrop-shaped implants, the decision is made for you—they are all textured (see #2). So you don’t have to even think about this one.

11) What is the point of a “Gummy Bear” round implant, like the one Sientra makes?

At first I was very gung-ho about this one—it seemed like the solution to almost everyone’s problems. The texturing would decrease the rate of contracture, and the increased stiffness would keep it from rippling, without having to make a commitment to a teardrop-shaped implant if the patient wasn’t a good candidate for one. However, I have learned myself that this one is not the be-all and end-all answer for everyone. I’ve seen some great results and just recently one not-so-great. Again, with these Gummy-Bear implants, no matter what shape they are, the breast skin around them has to be tight. If there is any looseness at all you can get a weird “sandbag” effect when it moves.

I hope that the above FAQ’s were helpful for those of you trying to sort out some honest, unbiased answers.

So back to Angelina…do I know which implants she has? There are rumors filtering down through the Beverly Hills plastic surgery grapevine…But just remember that, no matter how amazing she looks (let’s be honest, she looked pretty amazing to begin with, and she had amazing surgeons at the Pink Lotus Breast Center) don’t automatically assume that whatever amazing implants she has are the right ones for you.

Everyone is different. Angelina Jolie is a thin woman who had bilateral prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomies. You may be undergoing a procedure for breast cancer, a removal and replacement for previously ruptured implants or capsular contracture, or you may be just be considering a breast augmentation to kick off the summer in a bikini… Regardless, your situation is unique, and your plastic surgeon should be able to discuss the pro’s and con’s of each type of implant, so that you understand the choice that you are making.

Still, having said all that, there’s no denying that from a financial standpoint, when it happens, the identification of the “Angelina Jolie breast implant” brand will unquestionably give that company a “leg up.”

Screen Shot 2013-06-05 at 9.48.29 AM

(sorry couldn’t resist :))




Answer to the question “Which breast implant does Angelina Jolie have?

If you saw some of the press releases about her experience, you may have noticed that somewhere in there it says she had a “shaped implant.” Well, at the time of her procedures, Sientra was the only company who’s teardrop-shaped implants were available for general use. So, there you go.

  1. Penrose Anderson said:

    An excellent post as always, with some excellent visuals and gorgeous shots. Thank you, Lipo Queen.

  2. dee rennolds said:

    Lipo Queen, Fabulous and very informative. Thank you!!

    Can you comment on how the fat removed through liposuction can be injected into a face for re-sculpting due to age related fat loss? Are the results more predictable than they were a few years ago? And, if implants are removed, can they be replaced with fat harvested from liposuction? Does the space left by the implant create a better site for the fat injection into the breast?

    • Hi Dee!
      Glad you are finding the info useful!
      Yes, liposuctioned fat can definitely be used to replace volume in the face. The results are more predictable in the upper face than in the lower face, because the movement in the lower face causes more of the fat to absorb. So it is usually longer-lasting in the temporal areas, the upper cheeks, and under the eyes. There is not yet any evidence that “stem cell enhancement” improves the volume retention of the fat in “stem cell facelifts.” I often remove implants in patients and do autologous fat transfer to the breasts to replace some of the volume, but this fat does not go into the space where the implant was. The fat has to be injected in micro droplets into the surrounding tissue, between the muscle and the gland and the skin. In fact, the idea is to have that big space where the implant was close down–to do this we place suction drains during the surgery that can stay in for up to a week.

      Hope these answers are helpful! Let me know if you have any more questions!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s